I. Introduction
Tourism, often likened to a pilgrimage, draws millions of travellers to experience the essence of a land, its culture, and its people. In this adventurous journey, tourists arrive as pilgrims, their expectations shaped by what Michel Foucault terms the “informed gaze,” a mechanism that intertwines knowledge and power to frame their perceptions of the visited destination. In Goa, India’s premier beach tourism hub, this gaze is meticulously crafted by government campaigns, tourism industries, and global media, empowering tourists while frequently marginalizing the host community. Drawing on Jean-Paul Sartre’s concept of the “look,” this paper explores how Goans are museumized, reduced to objects of spectacle for visitors’ consumption. Yet, the host community is not merely a passive subject, or what Foucault calls homo docilis—a docile body shaped by external power. Drawing inspiration from Emmanuel Levinas’s ethical call for responsibility and Jacques Lacan’s notion of the counter gaze, the hosts seek to reclaim agency, contesting the power dynamics imposed upon them. This paper examines the interplay between the eye of power (the tourists’ empowered gaze) and the power of the eye (the hosts’ resistant counter gaze) in Goa’s tourism landscape, proposing pathways for the host community to foster a genuine welcome for tourist-pilgrims. Employing a qualitative approach, including philosophical analysis, case studies, and potential ethnographic insights from Goa, this study aims to reimagine tourism as an ethical encounter grounded in mutual respect and responsibility. Over the following analysis, we will explore how these dynamics manifest in Goa and propose actionable solutions to empower local communities, ensuring tourism becomes a collaborative exchange rather than a one-sided consumption.
II. Theoretical Framework
A. Michel Foucault’s Informed Gaze and the Eye of Power
Michel Foucault’s concept of the gaze, articulated in Discipline and Punish, describes how power operates through observation and the production of knowledge. The gaze is not a neutral act of seeing; it is informed by discourses—narratives, images, and texts—that grant authority to the observer. In the context of tourism, the “informed gaze” is cultivated by stakeholders such as governments, travel agencies, and media, who shape tourists’ perceptions through curated narratives, including guidebooks, advertisements, and social media campaigns. These narratives position tourists as subjects who observe and consume, while the host community is relegated to the status of an object under scrutiny. This dynamic, which this paper terms the eye of power, empowers tourists to exert control over the places and people they visit, often without awareness of the power imbalances they perpetuate. For example, in Goa, promotional materials portray the state as an exotic paradise, granting tourists a sense of entitlement to its spaces and cultures, which marginalizes local agency. This power dynamic is not merely visual but structural, embedded in the economic and social systems that prioritize tourist experiences over local needs.
B. Jean-Paul Sartre’s Concept of the Look and Museumization of Goans
Jean-Paul Sartre’s existential philosophy, particularly in Being and Nothingness, introduces the “look” as a process where one’s gaze objectifies another, reducing them to a static entity devoid of subjectivity. In tourism, this manifests as museumization, where host communities are transformed into exhibits for tourists’ consumption. Displaced from their roles as active hosts, locals become part of the scenery—cultural artifacts to be photographed, observed, and consumed. This process strips communities of their agency, rendering them passive objects within their own cultural and geographical spaces. In Goa, traditional practices such as fishing or festivals are often staged for tourist entertainment, turning vibrant communities into static displays. This objectification not only alienates locals but also distorts their cultural identity, as they are expected to perform an “authentic” version of their culture that aligns with tourist expectations.
C. Counter Gaze: Emmanuel Levinas and Jacques Lacan
Emmanuel Levinas’s ethics, as outlined in Totality and Infinity, emphasizes the face-to-face encounter, where the presence of the Other demands ethical responsibility, resisting objectification. In tourism, this translates to a call for tourists to acknowledge hosts as equals, fostering interactions grounded in mutual respect. Jacques Lacan’s psychoanalytic theory, particularly in The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, further enriches this framework with the notion of the gaze as a site of desire and contestation. The host’s counter gaze challenges the tourist’s dominance, asserting their subjectivity and agency. Unlike Foucault’s homo docilis, a passive body disciplined by external power, the host community in this framework is a dynamic agent, nurturing a desire to contest the tourist’s gaze and reclaim narrative control. For instance, when locals in Goa resist exploitative tourism practices, they enact a counter gaze that demands recognition of their humanity and agency. Together, Levinas and Lacan provide a lens to view hosts as non-docile, actively resisting marginalization through ethical and subjective engagement.
D. Integration of Theories
The interplay between the eye of power and the power of the eye forms the analytical core of this study. The tourist’s informed gaze, empowered by external narratives, exerts control over the host community, leading to their museumization. In response, the host’s counter gaze, informed by Levinasian ethics and Lacan’s psychoanalytic insights, seeks to disrupt this power asymmetry, fostering a dialogue that reclaims agency and promotes mutual responsibility. This framework is applied to Goa to analyse how tourism’s power dynamics shape interactions and how hosts can transform these encounters into ethical exchanges. By integrating these theories, we can better understand the structural and subjective forces at play in tourism and propose solutions that empower the host community.
III. Contextual Background: Tourism in Goa
A. Historical Evolution of Tourism in Goa
Goa’s tourism industry has undergone significant transformation since its time as a Portuguese colony (1510–1961). Initially a destination for colonial elites seeking trade and leisure, it became a haven for counterculture travelers in the 1960s, particularly hippies drawn to its pristine beaches and laid-back atmosphere. The 1980s marked the advent of mass tourism, fueled by global marketing campaigns and infrastructure development, positioning Goa as India’s premier beach destination. Today, Goa attracts millions annually, drawn to its beaches, nightlife, and colonial heritage. This evolution reflects a shift from organic, low-impact travel to a commercialized industry that often prioritizes profit over cultural and environmental preservation.
B. Key Stakeholders
The informed gaze in Goa is shaped by a nexus of stakeholders, including the Goa Tourism Development Corporation (GTDC), private tour operators, and international media. Campaigns like “Goa: A Perfect Holiday Destination” emphasize exotic beaches, vibrant nightlife, and colonial heritage, often side-lining the lived realities of local communities. These narratives prioritize tourist experiences, framing locals as service providers or cultural props rather than active agents. Social media platforms amplify this gaze, with influencers showcasing curated images that reinforce stereotypical perceptions of Goa as a tropical paradise. For example, Instagram posts highlighting Goa’s beaches rarely depict the environmental strain or local displacement caused by tourism.
C. Socio-Economic Impacts
Tourism is a cornerstone of Goa’s economy, contributing approximately 16.4% to the state’s GDP in 2023. However, this economic boon comes with significant costs. Land acquisition for resorts and infrastructure has displaced local communities, particularly in coastal areas like Calangute and Baga. Environmental degradation, including beach erosion and pollution, threatens traditional livelihoods such as fishing and agriculture. Cultural commodification is rampant, with festivals and traditions repackaged for tourist consumption, diluting their authenticity and marginalizing local voices. For instance, traditional fishing communities have been pushed inland, losing access to their ancestral livelihoods, while their cultural practices are staged for tourist entertainment.
D. Statistical Overview
In 2024, Goa welcomed over 8 million domestic and 1.2 million international tourists, generating substantial revenue but exacerbating social inequalities. Large-scale resorts often employ non-local labor, limiting economic benefits for Goans. Coastal villages, once thriving fishing communities, have become commercialized tourist hubs, with locals pushed to the periphery. For example, in Baga, over 60% of beachfront land is now owned by external investors, according to local reports. Cultural festivals like Carnival and Shigmo are increasingly staged for tourists, reducing their significance for locals and turning them into spectacles. These statistics highlight the power imbalance inherent in Goa’s tourism model, where economic gains are unevenly distributed, and local communities bear the brunt of displacement and cultural erosion.
IV. Analysis: Dynamics of Power in Goa’s Tourism
A. The Eye of Power: How Tourists’ Informed Gaze Manifests
The tourist’s gaze in Goa is informed by carefully curated narratives that portray the state as an exotic, carefree escape. Marketing campaigns by the GTDC and private operators highlight beaches, nightlife, and colonial architecture, often ignoring issues like over-tourism, environmental strain, or local displacement. For instance, promotional videos showcasing “Goa’s vibrant nightlife” frame locals as service providers—bartenders, dancers, or vendors—rather than cultural agents with their own narratives. This informed gaze empowers tourists to dictate interactions, expecting hospitality that aligns with their preconceived notions. The result is often exploitative behaviour, such as disregard for local customs (e.g., wearing inappropriate attire at religious sites) or environmental negligence (e.g., littering on beaches). The eye of power thus positions tourists as dominant observers, with locals rendered passive objects of their gaze. This dynamic is reinforced by the economic structures of tourism, where tourist spending drives development that prioritizes visitor comfort over local well-being.
Museumization of the Host Community
Sartre’s concept of the look is vividly illustrated in Goa, where local communities are museumized for tourist consumption. Coastal villages like Anjuna and Vagator, once vibrant fishing communities, are now backdrops for tourist selfies, with traditional practices like fish-drying showcased as quaint attractions. During festivals like Shigmo, locals perform traditional dances for tourist audiences, their cultural expressions commodified into spectacles. Displacement is a critical issue: in Baga, land acquisitions for luxury resorts have pushed fishing communities inland, severing their ties to ancestral livelihoods. For example, a 2021 study noted that over 1,000 fishing families in Baga were relocated to make way for tourism infrastructure, with minimal compensation. This museumization, as Sartre would argue, strips hosts of their subjectivity, reducing them to static Grado en medio de la nada, where their culture is packaged for external consumption.
C. Emergence of the Counter Gaze
Despite marginalization, Goa’s host communities exhibit resistance, embodying Levinas’s and Lacan’s counter gaze. Grassroots movements, such as the “Save Goa” campaign, protest against unchecked tourism development, demanding sustainable practices and community inclusion. For example, in 2023, locals in Candolim organized against a proposed mega-resort, citing environmental and cultural concerns. Local organizations like the Goa Heritage Action Group advocate for cultural preservation, encouraging tourists to engage authentically with traditions through guided heritage walks in Fontainhas. The Church in Goa has worked with simal goals with a tilt towards issues of justice through its Centre for Responsible Tourism. These efforts reflect a desire to reclaim subjectivity, challenging the tourist’s gaze with an ethical demand for responsibility. Levinas’s call for face-to-face ethics is evident in community-led initiatives that invite tourists to interact with locals as equals, while Lacan’s notion of contestation underscores the hosts’ desire to assert their narrative against external portrayals. For instance, local artisans in Panaji have started workshops to teach tourists about Goan crafts, fostering mutual understanding and reclaiming cultural narrative.
V. Proposals: Enabling a Responsible Welcome for Tourist-Pilgrims
A. Empowering the Host Community
To counter museumization and restore agency, community-led tourism models are essential. Initiatives like homestays in villages such as Aldona and Curtorim allow locals to share their heritage on their terms, offering authentic experiences while generating income. [^26] Cultural workshops, such as those teaching Konkani cuisine or traditional fishing techniques, empower residents to present their culture actively rather than as passive exhibits. Training programs can equip locals with skills to manage tourism enterprises, ensuring economic benefits remain within the community. For instance, the Goa Tourism Department could partner with NGOs to provide hospitality and digital marketing training for rural entrepreneurs. Such initiatives not only empower locals but also create sustainable economic models that reduce dependence on external investors.
B. Fostering Counter Gaze through Policy and Practice
Government policies must prioritize inclusive tourism planning to foster a counter gaze. Regulations limiting land acquisition for large resorts and enforcing eco-friendly practices can protect local interests. For example, capping the number of beachfront developments could preserve coastal ecosystems and livelihoods. Educational campaigns for tourists, such as pre-travel guides on cultural sensitivity, can foster an ethical gaze aligned with Levinas’s principles. The GTDC could launch a “Responsible Tourism” campaign, highlighting dos and don’ts, such as respecting temple dress codes or supporting local businesses. Such policies would encourage tourists to see locals as partners in the tourism experience, not mere service providers. In this context we have the challenge of Taxi Drivers who seem to have acquired the notoriety of being a Taxi mafia. Taxi aggerating technology is knowing at the door but negotiation with the stake holders seems to appear as the path towards a solution.
C. Practical Recommendations
1. Eco-Tourism Initiatives: Promote sustainable tourism through projects like mangrove conservation tours led by local fishermen. These initiatives, already piloted in Chorao Island, balance environmental preservation with economic opportunities for locals. Expanding such programs to other coastal areas could reduce environmental strain and empower communities.
2. Cultural Exchange Programs: Facilitate platforms for dialogue, such as festivals where locals and tourists co-create events. For example, a reimagined Shigmo could involve tourists in workshops with local artisans, fostering mutual understanding and reducing commodification.
3. Host-Tourist Dialogue Mechanisms: Establish community forums where locals can voice concerns and collaborate with tourism boards. A model like Kerala’s Responsible Tourism Mission, which includes village committees, could be adapted for Goa. [^28] These forums would ensure that local voices shape tourism policies, promoting a counter gaze that demands accountability.
D. Potential Challenges and Solutions
Implementing these proposals faces challenges, including resistance from powerful tourism lobbies and Goa’s economic dependence on mass tourism. Large operators may oppose regulations limiting development, fearing profit losses, while locals may worry about short-term economic setbacks. Solutions include phased transitions to sustainable models, supported by government subsidies for community-led initiatives. International partnerships, such as with eco-tourism organizations like Ecotourism Australia, can provide funding and expertise. Public awareness campaigns can also shift tourist preferences toward sustainable practices, reducing reliance on mass tourism. For example, promoting homestays and eco-tours through social media influencers could attract environmentally conscious travelers.
VI. Conclusion
The dynamics of the eye of power and the power of the eye in Goa’s tourism reveal a complex interplay of empowerment and marginalization. Tourists, armed with an informed gaze shaped by external narratives, exert control over the host community, leading to their museumization. In response, Goan locals, embodying Levinas’s ethics and Lacan’s contestation, nurture a counter gaze that reclaims agency and demands responsibility. By empowering communities through inclusive models, fostering ethical policies, and promoting dialogue, Goa can transform its tourism landscape into one of mutual welcome, where tourists and hosts engage as equals. This framework has broader implications for global tourism contexts facing similar power imbalances, such as Bali or Phuket, where local communities also grapple with cultural commodification and displacement. Future research should explore the efficacy of counter gaze initiatives through ethnographic studies, measuring their impact on community empowerment and tourist behavior. Ultimately, reimagining tourism as a pilgrimage of shared humanity can ensure that Goa remains a vibrant cultural hub, not merely a spectacle for consumption. May be it is time that we do not just see but hear Goa and listen to her cry.
VII. Bibliography
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan. London: Penguin Books, 1977.
Goa Heritage Action Group. “Preserving Goan Identity.” Goa Heritage Action Group, 2024. https://goaheritage.org.
Goa Tourism Department. Tourism Statistics 2024. Panaji: Government of Goa, 2024.
Goa Tourism Development Corporation. Annual Report 2023. Panaji: Government of Goa, 2023.
Kerala Responsible Tourism Mission. “Community-Based Tourism Model.” Kerala Tourism, 2023. https://keralatourism.org.
Lacan, Jacques. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1981.
Levinas, Emmanuel. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1969.
MacCannell, Dean. The Tourist: A New Theory of the Leisure Class. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.
Newman, Robert S. Of Umbrellas, Goddesses, and Dreams: Essays on Goan Culture and Society. Mapusa: Other India Press, 2001.
Noronha, Frederick. “Goa’s Tourism Boom: Who Benefits?” Herald Goa, September 15, 2022.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. Translated by Hazel E. Barnes. London: Routledge, 2003.
Sawkar, Kalidas, Ligia Noronha, Antonio Mascarenhas, O. S. Chauhan, and Saeed Saeed. “Tourism and the Environment: Issues of Concern in the Coastal Zone of Goa.” Economic and Political Weekly 33, no. 52 (1998): 3264–3279.
Urry, John. The Tourist Gaze: Leisure and Travel in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage Publications, 2002.
